Subscribe for updates!

Latest Photos

Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies Controversies
Search this blog..

Top Stories of the week

Our Link Partners

Link Exchange? Click Here

The John Terry controversies – a complete list

Posted in : Sports

(added 1 hours ago)

The John Terry controversies – a complete listJohn Terry on his day is one of the best central defenders in the Premier League, and certainly an important player for Chelsea and England.

However, the 31-year-old is in danger of missing out on Euro 2012, after being stripped of his nation’s captaincy due to the ongoing allegations of racism against the Barking-born man. This, for sure, is not the first controversy to blight Terry’s career, as the following rap sheet shows.

Fined two weeks wages for drunkenly mocking American tourists in Heathrow Airport in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Charged with assault and affray after a confrontation with a nightclub bouncer in January 2002, Terry was suspended from England duty and subsequently missed out on the 2002 World Cup. He was later cleared of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, unlawful wounding, possessing a bottle as an offensive weapon and affray.

In February 2002 Terry was caught on CCTV urinating into a beer glass and dropping it on the floor of an Essex nightclub. Fined £60 for parking his Bentley in a disabled bay. In 2004, Terry was reported to have gambled up to £40,000 a week on horse and dog racing with Wayne Bridge and Scott Parker. Sent off against Tottenham in November 2006 at White Hart Lane, and accused of racially abusing Ledley

King. Questioned the integrity of referee Graham Poll, and was later fined £10,000 for inappropriate conduct. Before marrying Toni Poole in 2007, admitted to cheating on his partner up to eight times. Jenny Barker, 17, claims that Terry cheated on Poole with her in a public car park.

Investigated by Chelsea and the FA for reportedly accepting a £10,000 bribe to show a reporter around the London club’s training ground without permission in 2009. In 2009 the centre back’s father Ted Terry was filmed allegedly selling cocaine to an undercover reporter, months after his mother, Sue, and mother-in-law had been cautioned for shoplifting.

In January 2010 Terry was alleged to have had a four-month affair with Wayne Bridge’s girlfriend Vanessa Perroncel. Bridge was deemed as one of Terry’s best friends, and Perroncel was the mother of the left back’s child. Fabio Capello stripped Terry of the England captaincy due to the scandal, handing it to Rio Ferdinand.

Accused of racially abusing QPR defender Anton Ferdinand in a 1-0 defeat for Chelsea at Loftus Road in October 2011. Investigated by the FA and police, Terry will stand trial in July 2012. Stripped of his country’s captaincy for the second time. Terry may well look back at the above list with shame and regret once his playing days are over, as the constant controversies in his life have taken away from his ability on the pitch.

With England producing some exciting young defenders in recent times, Euro 2012 could be Terry’s last swansong at a major international tournament, but his involvement is now not assured due to his July court date.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 1 hours ago) / 2 views

Veena Malik, Vedita Pratap's ugly fight

Posted in : Show Biz

(added 13 days ago)

Veena Malik, Vedita Pratap's ugly fightVedita Pratap, who does not share a very good rapport with her co-star Veena Malik, has accused her of intentionally hurting her during an action sequence in Mumbai 125km

They have never been friends. And so, Veena Malik and Vedita Pratap's fight for a sequence in Mumbai 125km did not require a lot of acting skills. In fact, Mumbai Mirror has learnt that Vedita, who has been injured on her forehead as a result of the scene, has accused Veena of intentionally hurting her.

According to a unit member, Veena took the scene more seriously than was perhaps required and as a result Vedita had to be rushed to the hospital. The source revealed, "In the scene, Veena had to pull Vedita by the neck and bang her head on an iron rod. It created a lot of commotion on the sets and director Hemant Madhukar was brought in to resolve the issue. Vedita, who was furious, told Hemant that Veena purposely hurt her."

Vedita's injury was reportedly nursed at a city hospital. The source informed that she is currently undergoing treatment to get rid of the scar on her forehead.

When contacted, Vedita confirmed the incident and said, "It was an action sequence. I was supposed to be beaten up. I don't know what happened to Veena. She actually hurt me and she did it so badly that I had nail marks on my body. I don't know what was wrong with her. And then she pushed me so badly and banged my head on the rod. After the incident, I spoke to the director and told him that she is deliberately doing this. Acting is one thing, but this is just over acting."

When asked if there is any enmity among them on the sets, she said, "I don't know. I think somewhere she is just insecure or just waited for the opportunity to do something like this to me. As a result of the injury, I have marks on my forehead, which I have to undergo treatment to get rid off."

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 13 days ago) / 17 views

Berdych tension set to continue in quarters

Posted in : Sports

(added 14 days ago)

It hasn't quite taken on full-scale "bodyline" proportions, but the Australian Open quarter-final between Rafael Nadal and Tomas Berdych still has a whiff of one of cricket's greatest controversies about it.

Berdych comes to the quarters by way of a fourth-round match in which his Spanish opponent Nicolas Almagro angered him by belting a tennis ball at his head. The Czech, in turn, refused to observe the etiquette of shaking his opponent's hand at the net after the final point, drawing a hostile response from the crowd and prominent figures including the Superbrat himself John McEnroe, who suggested Berdych needed to "toughen up".

While Nadal won't necessarily be looking to restore Spanish honour when he gets onto Rod Laver Arena tomorrow, he and Berdych have their own "history". Six years ago in Madrid, Berdych upset Nadal by signalling to the crowd to be quiet after he beat the Spaniard.

The pair exchanged words at the net and relations have been strained ever since. After his victory over Almagro, Berdych declined an invitation to further stoke the controversy, instead praising Nadal ahead of their 2010 Wimbledon final rematch.
 
"He didn't drop a set yet and he's playing with confidence really well," Berdych said. "He's shown he's a great tennis player ... he deserves the position he has, maybe even higher. "For me, it's going to be extremely tough."

Berdych, the seventh seed, has dropped only two sets in his four matches, to Spain's Albert Ramos in the first round and Almagro in round four. On paper, his opposition on the way to the quarters has been stronger than the second-seeded Nadal's.

Controversies aside, Berdych rightly described his match with Almagro as "fantastic" as suggested by a scoreline including three tiebreak sets. Nadal's fourth-rounder against countryman Feliciano Lopez was his first with a seeded opponent and, accordingly, his toughest of the championship. The 10-time grand slam champion said his low-key lead-up to the championship appeared to be paying off.

"I think I started the tournament playing really well," Nadal said after beating Lopez. "I felt that the first day I played well ... second day I played well. "Today I played another complete match ... serious match."Nadal acknowledged that the second week of a grand slam can be a whole different matter.

And it might require some improvement. "It is the moment to keep playing well and try to go a little bit more," he said. "But I am in the right place, right moment. "I am happy."Whether he conveys that emotion across the net toward Berdych may be another matter.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 14 days ago) / 13 views

Controversies over the years in Pakistan vs England cricket history

Posted in : Sports

(added 16 days ago)

As every doosra and teesra out of Saeed Ajmal’s hand passed the incapable strokes of perplexed Englishmen, the smell of a potential controversy got stronger with every wicket in the packed media centre of an otherwise empty cricket stadium in Dubai.

Controversies over the years in Pakistan vs England cricket history

Staying completely loyal to their predecessors, the British journalists and media men triggered another controversy by questioning the bowling action of Pakistan’s new spin king and the wisdom behind his selection of attire that consisted of a full sleeved T-shirt. Rumours abound that Ajmal’s action might come under an even sterner media examination following England’s defeat in the first Test.
 
Controversies, however, are nothing new in Pakistan vs England encounters. Here’s a look at some of the major controversies that have plagued the relationship of these two cricketing giants over the past decades:
 
1. Ian Botham’s distasteful comment against Pakistan – 1983
 
Ian Botham was never shy of openly expressing his views and, naturally, controversies always dogged him both on and off the cricket field. In 1983, after being forced to fly back home from Pakistan during the Test Series between Pakistan and England, Botham’s views once again sparked controversy.
 
“….the kind of place to send your mother-in-law for a month, all expenses paid.”
 
This is how he described Pakistan, for which he eventually had to apologise. Less than a decade later Botham ate his words when a certain Wasim Akram got rid of him for a duck in the World Cup 1992 final and Amir Sohail asked him:
 
“Who’s coming in next? Your mother-in-law?”
 
2. Mike Gatting’s finger-wagging showdown with umpire Shakoor Rana - 1987
 Being  0-1 down in their away Test series against Pakistan in 1987, an under-pressure England captain Mike Gatting got himself involved in high drama, with Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana – an incident that almost saw the tour being called off midway.
 
In a bizarre turn of events, umpire Rana called Mike Gatting “a f***ing” cheat on his insistence to move his fielders during the bowler’s run-up. Gatting returned the favour in an equally fearsome manner and his finger-wagging while shouting at Rana made headlines worldwide. Rana demanded an official apology and halted play until then. Finally, after losing the whole third day of play and government intervention of the highest level, the series continued towards its logical conclusion.
 
3. Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, reverse swing & ball tampering - 1992
 By 1992, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis were supreme exponents of reverse swing. The Englishmen, however, found it hard to digest. As processions of English batsmen started making their way back to the pavilion, the English media waged a war on the legendary Pakistani swing kings that has never really settled since. Wasim Akarm and Waqar Younis, along with other Pakistani players, were at the centre of ball-tampering accusations from the English media and players. England’s case, however, was rubbished off by their own batting legend Sir Geoffrey Boycott when he termed English batsmen as incapable and that Pakistani bowlers would get them out even if they bowled with oranges!
 
4. Wait Until Dark! – Moin Khan gives away the Karachi fortress - 2000
 When Pakistan collapsed in the third innings of the Karachi Test against England, they were in danger of losing a Test match at the National Stadium for the first time in 39 years. Moin Khan, the Pakistani captain, was in no mood to get his name in the record books for the wrong reasons and tried every tactic to slow down the game to an eventual draw. Umpire Steve Bucknor, however, ruined Moin’s plans and allowed play to go on in near darkness as England secured one of their most famous wins.
 
5. “Boom Boom” Afridi dances on the pitch - 2005
 
Being the innocent guy he is, Shahid Afridi usually finds unique ways of serving his team. On this occasion, assuming considerable lack of attention from his surroundings, Afridi decided to try a few dance moves on the cricket pitch. The cameras, however, were watching and so was Kevin Pieterson. Afridi got penalised for his innocence and Pakistan’s image suffered a further dent.
 
6. The Oval fiasco – first forfeited Test in history - 2006
 Not many thought that a man as laid back as Inzamam-ul Haq would be at the centre of cricket’s first forfeited Test match in 129 years. When Umpire Darrell Hair accused  Pakistan of ball tampering and awarded five penalty runs to England, Pakistan captain Inzamam protested without much success. However, when the teams went for the tea break, few predicted what was to follow. In a completely unexpected turn of events, Inzi along with the rest of the Pakistan team, refused to come back to the field in protest against the ball tampering charges. Umpires Billy Doctrove and Darrell Hair waited for a while and then awarded the match to England, the fist such instance in 129 years.
 
7. The Three Idiots – Spot-fixing Scandal – 2010
 Very rarely has the world seen talents such as Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Asif together on the cricket field. It’s a pity, however, that they will never be seen together again. When Amir and Asif overstepped while bowling with inconceivably large margins under the supervision of their leader in crime Salman Butt, Pakistan cricket fell into the dirtiest sporting controversy in its history. The three cricketers were eventually banned and later convicted of criminal charges in the UK and are now serving their sentences behind bars.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 16 days ago) / 23 views

NBA Rumors: Dwight Howard and the Biggest Controversies Brewing in the League

Posted in : Sports

(added 18 days ago)

The NBA season is only a few weeks old, but already there are big controversies brewing. Some of them have spilled over from the offseason, and some are developing nightly as players become increasingly frustrated with their team's performance. Either way, the following list shows some of the biggest controversies growing around the league. It will be interesting to wait and see how each one plays out.

NBA Rumors: Dwight Howard and the Biggest Controversies Brewing in the League

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 18 days ago) / 23 views

Pakistan v England – conflict and controversy

Posted in : Sports

(added 20 days ago)

Dubai - Pakistan and England face each other on Tuesday for the first time since the infamous 2010 spot fixing scandal which ended with three Pakistani players sent to prison. Since they first clashed in international cricket in 1952, the two countries have been at the centre of number of conflicts and controversies.

Pakistan v England – conflict and controversy

Here AFP Sport examines five flashpoints:
2010: Spot-fixing scandal - One of the biggest fixing controversies in the history of the game was unearthed by the now defunct British tabloid the News of the World on August 28, 2010 when they revealed Pakistani pacemen Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Aamer contrived with captain Salman Butt and agent Mazhar Majeed to bowl deliberate no-balls during the Lord's Test.

The scandal rocked the game. All four accused were interrogated by Scotland Yard before an anti-corruption tribunal of the International Cricket Council (ICC) handed the three players lengthy bans. A British court then sent Majeed to jail for 32 months, Butt for 30 months, Asif for 12 months and Aamer for six.

Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Ijaz Butt enraged the England team by alleging they'd been involved in fixing a one-day game at The Oval during the same series. Those allegations put the last two matches in doubt as England demanded an apology from Butt. He finally retracted and apologised.
2006: Oval fiasco

- Australian umpire Darrell Hair and West Indian colleague Billy Doctrove penalised Pakistan five runs for ball-tampering on the fourth day of the fifth and final Test of the 2006 series against England at The Oval. So incensed were Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul Haq and his side they refused to take the field after tea and were thus deemed to have forfeited the match -- the first time this had happened in Test cricket history.

After a hearing presided over by ICC chief match referee Ranjan Madugalle, Pakistan were cleared of ball-tampering but Inzamam was banned for four one-day internationals for bringing the game into disrepute. Under pressure, the ICC then declared the game a draw before reverting to their original decision of an England win. 2005: Afridi damages pitch

- Pakistan all-rounder Shahid Afridi was caught on television scraping his boots on the surface when play was held up after a gas cylinder exploded during the Faisalabad Test of England's 2005 tour.
Umpire Hair and England batsman Marcus Trescothick noticed the difference in the pitch and the suspicions were confirmed by television footage. Afridi pleaded guilty to a level three breach of the ICC code of conduct and was handed a ban of one Test and two one-day internationals.
1992: 'Ball-tampering' saga

- Pakistan's fearsome pace duo of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis demolished England with unprecedented reverse swing but were labelled as "cheats" by the English media on the 1992 tour. Pakistan won the five-match Test series 2-1 with Waqar claiming 22 wickets and Wasim 21. Finally the saga took an ugly turn when the umpires had to change the ball during the Lord's one-dayer, suspecting ball-tampering. Pakistan team manager Khalid Mahmood defended his bowlers but the allegations reverberated during the tour and the relationship between the two teams continued to remain bitter.
1987: Gatting-Rana row

- Mike Gatting, England's captain on the 1987 tour of Pakistan, had a finger-wagging row with Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana which made worldwide headlines and almost led to the tour being called off.
After losing the first Test on a controversial note, Gatting got entangled in a row with Rana. The skipper was accused of moving a fielder during the bowler's run-up. Rana stopped the game and called Gatting a "cheat" to which the England skipper prodded his finger at the Pakistani umpire. Rana refused to stand again until he received a formal apology. The entire third day was lost and the tour was nearly called off before high-level government influence saw it continue.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 20 days ago) / 18 views

Pakistan vs England - conflict and controversy

Posted in : Sports

(added 22 days ago)

DUBAI: Pakistan and England face each other on Tuesday for the first time since the infamous 2010 spot fixing scandal which ended with three Pakistani players sent to prison. Since they first clashed in international cricket in 1952, the two countries have been at the centre of number of conflicts and controversies.

We examines five flashpoints:

2010: Spot-fixing scandal
One of the biggest fixing controversies in the history of the game was unearthed by the now defunct British tabloid the News of the World on August 28, 2010 when they revealed Pakistani pacemen Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Aamer contrived with captain Salman Butt and agent Mazhar Majeed to bowl deliberate no-balls during the Lord's Test.

The scandal rocked the game. All four accused were interrogated by Scotland Yard before an anti-corruption tribunal of the International Cricket Council (ICC) handed the three players lengthy bans. A British court then sent Majeed to jail for 32 months, Butt for 30 months, Asif for 12 months and Aamer for six.

Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Ijaz Butt enraged the England team by alleging they'd been involved in fixing a one-day game at The Oval during the same series. Those allegations put the last two matches in doubt as England demanded an apology from Butt. He finally retracted and apologised.

2006: Oval fiasco
Australian umpire Darrell Hair and West Indian colleague Billy Doctrove penalised Pakistan five runs for ball-tampering on the fourth day of the fifth and final Test of the 2006 series against England at The Oval. So incensed were Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul Haq and his side they refused to take the field after tea and were thus deemed to have forfeited the match -- the first time this had happened in Test cricket history.

After a hearing presided over by ICC chief match referee Ranjan Madugalle, Pakistan were cleared of ball-tampering but Inzamam was banned for four one-day internationals for bringing the game into disrepute. Under pressure, the ICC then declared the game a draw before reverting to their original decision of an England win.

2005: Afridi damages pitch
Pakistan all-rounder Shahid Afridi was caught on television scraping his boots on the surface when play was held up after a gas cylinder exploded during the Faisalabad Test of England's 2005 tour.

Umpire Hair and England batsman Marcus Trescothick noticed the difference in the pitch and the suspicions were confirmed by television footage. Afridi pleaded guilty to a level three breach of the ICC code of conduct and was handed a ban of one Test and two one-day internationals.

1992: 'Ball-tampering' saga
Pakistan's fearsome pace duo of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis demolished England with unprecedented reverse swing but were labelled as "cheats" by the English media on the 1992 tour. Pakistan won the five-match Test series 2-1 with Waqar claiming 22 wickets and Wasim 21. Finally the saga took an ugly turn when the umpires had to change the ball during the Lord's one-dayer, suspecting ball-tampering. Pakistan team manager Khalid Mahmood defended his bowlers but the allegations reverberated during the tour and the relationship between the two teams continued to remain bitter.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 22 days ago) / 21 views

Bethenny Frankel Addresses Show Controversy, Real Housewives of New York City Firings and More

Posted in : Show Biz

(added 26 days ago)

Bethenny Frankel Addresses Show Controversy, Real Housewives of New York City Firings and MoreYou know Bravo's tagline "Watch What Happens"? That's exactly what we're going to have to do when it comes to the recent controversies surrouding Bethenny Frankel. The former Real Housewives star, whose solo show Bethenny Ever After returns for its third season on Feb. 20, talked with reporters today at Bravo's press tour panel, where she assured us that questions about how "real" her reality show is and the drama surrounding her Skinnygirl Cocktails business, among other things, will definitely be addressed on the show.

Other topics Frankel tackled? The firing of her former costar Jill Zarin, with whom Frankel has been in a longtime feud, and Bravo's decision to air footage of Russell Armstrong...

Sour Grapes: Any true Bravo fans know about the infamous feud between Frankel and her former Real Housewives costar Zarin. Now that Zarin and several of her RHONYC co-stars have been let go by the network, Frankel was asked if she has any advice for her former besties. "Jill Zarin is definitely a survivor. She is definitely well-to-do and I don't think she's worried about finding a job."

Touching a bit on Zarin's firing, Frankel says she's not shocked that several of the ladies were let go by Bravo. "She was on the show for years, and in many of the cities people are only on for one or two seasons," she explains. "It just happens that they make it a little fresher. I'm sure she'll find exactly what she's looking for. It probably just stings a little bit. It's a little bit difficult. She has her own way of dealing with it. I'm sure it's difficult for her a little bit to watch what's going on with me. Maybe if I were in her position, that'd be difficult for me, too. She handles it the way she knows how."

Crossing The Line?: The issue of Russell Armstrong's tragic suicide was brought on during the panel, and Frankel was asked if she thinks Bravo may be crossing the line when it comes to the Real Housewives franchise. While not addressing the Armstrong marriage specifically, Frankel says the franchise is much different from when she first signed on, perhaps attracting "more dramatic women" who "want to be more dramatic than the next."

"When I came on the show, it was called Manhattan Moms. Real Housewives wasn't even a franchise. There was one city," she explains. "We were all very new to it and we didn't even know what it was. It was very fresh. Now, people who sign on to do reality shows, they have a preconceived notion. They've seen it already and some people probably show a more dramatic side of their lives and are more dramatic because they want to up the ante. Certainly on Bravo the shows are real. It's really happening."

Addressing the Drama: Frankel has faced several media attacks in recent months, including whether or not scenes from her show are staged and that her Skinnygirl Cocktails aren't exactly what they're advertised to be. Frankel credits her background and experiences for helping her get through the storm, pun fully intended. (Get it, the boat story?)

"I'd say I'm definitely a survivor because of [my background]. This season is about working through it, whether it's in your relationship or in your business," she says. "The minute that I sold part of my business, it was like someone was waiting at my door to hit me with a baseball bat in the back of the head. I do tend to thrive when I need to survive, when I'm up against adversity. "

While Frankel says the bad press has been "challenging," it's helped her learn a lot. Also? It's stroking her ego a bit! "I'm also a little bit flattered because it means I must've really made something out of myself, because there are that many that that want to tear me down," she says. "A lot of people want to tear me down, and if I were them, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen."

So why hasn't Frankel publicly addressed any of the drama? "There was a period when I felt that I really had to react and explain and that period has passed. A lot of that gets addressed on the show."

Read the rest of this entry »

(added 26 days ago) / 36 views

I don't create controversies: Payal Rohatgi

Posted in : Show Biz

(added a month ago!)

I don't create controversies Payal RohatgiControversies continue to dog Payal Rohatgi and the actress says it's hard for her to understand why she's always at the receiving end. "I don't go out of the way to create controversies, I know some actresses pay their publicist money to create a controversy, but I don't know why this happens to me," Payal told IANS. "May be that's the way god wants me to learn from my experiences. It used to bother me earlier, but now it doesn't. I have crossed that stage of what people think about you," she added.

Whether it's her romantic dalliance with her reality TV co-star Rahul Mahajan or her wearing a bikini during a water task in the second season of Bigg Boss or accusing filmmaker Dibaker Bannerjee of seeking sexual favours, Payal has always hogged the limelight for the wrong reasons.

"I didn't want to enter the pool in swimwear or create those controversies. They (showmakers) created a task that had to be done in the water. Since it was water volleyball, I had to wear an outfit that suits the sport. But they clipped footage of mine entering the pool that was picked up by TV channels and converted into a controversy. It was not my fault," she said.

"They could have shown a shot of me inside the water, but they shot me when I was getting inside the water, they (channel) were desperate to create TRPs," she added.

However, she does credit the show for getting her recogniton. "When I started off, nobody held my hand and told me what I should do and how I should portray myself as an actor. When I went to Mumbai, I was in the process of figuring out what is good for me. Bigg Boss was a turning point. People started to relate to me...

"What films did not give me TV gave me. In films, may be I was lost or typecast. I was imagined in a particular way, I might not be. My identity as an indivdual became much stronger in Bigg Boss," said Payal, who has done films like Plan, 36 China Town and Dhol.

Last seen in reality show Zor Ka Jatka, Payal returns to the small screen with adventure reality show Survivor India and the actress says it is her attempt to change her stereotype image. "Yes, this show is an attempt to change the perception that was created in Big Boss. This show will have a side of Payal that is much more blunt, honest and upfront. In Bigg Boss, there were so many things that I didn't say and as a result, people thought I was a fake. I have not let it happen in Survivor," she said.

"Survivor India" is the Indian version of US reality show Survivor. It goes on air Friday with 11 celebrity contestants and 11 commoners. "It is about survival of the fittest, physically as well as mentally. It is not a luxury show, it is not a comfort zone show. Before going into the show, we all went through physical and psychological tests and those who were fit were selected. It was indeed challenging. I wanted to see how capable I am. I didn't want to be known as a weak link in the show and I survived my way into it," she added.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added a month ago!) / 38 views

Controversy HEATED up 2011 for Environment Ministry

Posted in : Health

(added a month ago!)

The Environment Ministry was hit by controversies in the year gone by which saw clearances for two big ticket projects -- POSCO and Lavasa -- and exit of Jairam Ramesh as the green minister.

Controversy HEATED up 2011 for Environment Ministry

Another highlight was India's participation at the Durban climate talks under the leadership of Jayanthi Natarajan who took over as Environment Minister in the midst of the year from Ramesh.  The death of Swami Nigamananda, who was agitating for saving the Ganga River and checking illegal mining in Uttarakhand, raised several questions.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added a month ago!) / 38 views